Thrillseeker2672 Thrillseeker2672
  • 13-01-2018
  • History
contestada

Why have nation-states been more successful, as political units, in modern world history then multinational empires have been?

Respuesta :

W0lf93
W0lf93 W0lf93
  • 26-01-2018
Empires had a meaning when land was the prime wealth of a state. The more the land, the more the peoples, the more profitable the taxation. As of the Renaissance however, the bourgeoisie had begun to prove that, better than land possession, trade and exchanges were the key to a wealthy nation. Because multinational empires had become antihistorical.
Answer Link

Otras preguntas

Identify the words with a similar denotation as terrified. options: frightened hesitant anxious scared
a. Bedouin-Who are they/what did they do?
What do y’all think :(
does the following atomic model of a chemical reaction correctly demonstrate the law conservation of matter why or why not plz help ​
A 0.07 kg tennis ball, initially at rest, leaves a racket with a speed of 56 m/s. If the ball is in contact with the racket for 0.04 s, what is the average forc
what is the sum of 4 and -5​
y = 30.078(1.003)*. Question 1 ? Question Use the exponential model to make predictions about closing prices of this stock. Remember that x represents the numbe
1. Use communication signals if you want to express beliefs, opinions, and contrast. 2. Opinion signals express agreement and disagreement. ​
The ratio of the number of cups of red paint to the number of cups of yellow paint that Garcia mixed to make a shade of orange paint is 4:1. Part A: Write a sen
Lincoln's initial presidential platform was to end slavery. a. TRUE b. FALSE